Every fund has a different thesis, a different portfolio, a different check size. Your deck should reflect that. Presender builds each VC a version that references their investments, their focus, and why they specifically should lead your round.
Type your company website and see your first slide.
The partners who write the checks see 30 decks a week. Yours competes with 29 that look identical — unless you give them a reason to read past slide 2.
You open your pitch deck, add the VC’s name to the email, and hit send. The partner has seen this exact structure 30 times this week. Your deck competes with 29 others that look identical.
Your best investor meetings happen when you research the fund first — mention their portfolio company, reference their thesis. But doing this for 50 funds? That’s 2 weeks of full-time research instead of building your product.
You email the deck and wait. Did the partner open it? Did they forward it to an associate for review? Did they spend 10 seconds or 10 minutes? You follow up blindly after a week, hoping you’re not being annoying.
Upload your pitch deck, financial model, market research, product screenshots. The interview captures your traction, your vision, your fundraising story, your unfair advantage.
Your pitch narrative — problem, solution, market, traction, team, ask — structured as a reusable template. The arguments stay the same. The framing adapts per fund.
TEMPLATE: Insert the fund name, partner name, check size, relevant portfolio company. 2 minutes. Free.
SPOTLIGHT: Paste the fund’s website. Presender reads their portfolio, their thesis, their recent investments — and frames your company as the logical next bet. 2 minutes. 1 credit.
Know which partners opened your deck, how long they spent on your traction slide, whether they forwarded it to a colleague (associate doing diligence), and when they came back for a second look.
Hi, I’m the founder of Cadence. We’re raising a seed round and I’d love to share our deck.
holt.vc
You’re raising a seed round. We pasted holt.vc. In 2 minutes, Presender:
That partner replied in 45 minutes: "Finally, a founder who did their homework."
Same buyer. Adjacent wedge. Different go-to-market motion. Built for the thesis you wrote about in March.
We’ve framed our traction in the same metrics your portfolio reports. You can compare apples to apples.
Your last 3 leads have all built into the same operating motion we need. We’re asking for the seat, not just the check.
A PDF to a partner’s inbox tells you nothing. A Presender link tells you who opened it, which slides triggered diligence, when forwarded copies are opened, and the moment the fund came back.
The partner opens your deck and forwards it to an associate. That’s not a rejection — that’s the start of due diligence. You’ll see both sessions and know which slides the associate focused on.
When a partner spends 3 minutes on your traction slide and returns the next day, they’re building a case internally. Your follow-up should include updated metrics — they’re ready to go deeper.
You sent your deck to 50 funds. 20 opened. 8 viewed all slides. 3 forwarded to associates. Focus your energy on those 3 — they’re the ones doing diligence. The other 47 passed.
All prices exclude VAT.
Build your founder profile in 15 minutes. Create your investor template in 3. Send a deck that names their portfolio, references their thesis, and tracks every open.